Sunday, December 29, 2013

Zero + Maria Cornejo

The show: Zero + Maria Cornejo Spring/Summer 2014

Inspiration: Broken architecture, everyday uniforms of past civilizations, the desert, earthiness, Palais de Tokyo, New York City piers 

Fabrics: Bonded cotton jersey, coated linen, glazed barrĂ©, glazed ramie, cotton jacquard, Hessian gauze, sheer cotton, woven Nappa (accessories), long-haired "pony skin"(accessories), sterling silver (jewelry). 

Colors: Beige, white, blue, black, bronze, silver

[All photos taken by me on September 9th, 2013.] 


























I liked the show as a whole. It was super exciting because I went with Octavia (thanks 'Tavia and Kara!!) again and we ran into a writer from Rookie Mag and she Instagram'd a picture of the two of us. I also met Lorna Simpson and I didn't even realize it.

Maria Cornejo's clothing is always straight-up cool and I appreciate that. There a lotsa things that are cool and things that are chill and I don't know if I know the difference yet.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

A Yawn and a Hose

[A male friend wrote a review about a book; he asked me to read the review and let him know what I thought. In his review he cited these quotations from the book, which was written by a woman: 

"As symbols go, the phallus is a yawn. Tubes that point and shoot and there you have it." 

"A phallus doesn't give you much to play with, metaphorically, and it doesn't lend itself to multiple interpretations. A hose is a hose is a hose is a hose."


He didn't finish the book, finding the writing to be too underscored by misandry. Below is my response to him. I am sharing this here because I thought it was a good example of banter about feminism. The author's name, the book's title, nor the friend's name were used to maintain anonymity.]


I think perhaps you took the author's words a bit too close to heart. Perhaps, as a woman, after years of being told explicitly and implicitly that I must be inferior, it is easier for me to allow a sentence or two insulting the metaphoric value of my genitals to just meander past me, unacknowledged. But for a man, it makes sense that it would be a more difficult feat to not put up a fight with a criticism of your prized phallus--for while the man, generally speaking, tends to identify himself with and in some cases perhaps even define himself by his cock, the woman does not rely solely on her vagina to define or identify her womanhood. However, I generalize; I know that this may just be my humble opinion, because I know that at my unripe stage of life I have not quite been able to grasp the concept of gender. But I do blame that partially on the fact that there are such rigid definitions of "man" and "woman" served to us on rusty tin platters from every angle, that indeed force the man to think that he is naught without his penis and the woman to believe that her physical appeal is the be all and end all of her worth. I have de-conditioned myself of the latter part of that sentence, and I do not care if my hair makes me "look like a lesbian" or that I really should wear makeup, or put on a real bra, etcetera etcetera et-fucking-cetera. All of it is nonsense. But I digress ever so slightly. The woman is taught that she must scrutinize every part of herself and fix what is imperfect and make herself perfect, no matter the physical, emotional, or fiscal cost. The man, however, is taught only to scrutinize his penis, and yes, he may be poked fun at for its size or for inopportune erections, but there is really nothing to be done to "fix" these "imperfections." 

I wholeheartedly believe that, considering the enormous hardship it is to be a woman in today's society--hell, in any day's society--from having to concern oneself with one's appearance, and fearing that one may be raped simply for BEING on a street at a certain angle of the Earth's rotation around the Sun, and striving to be considered for the quality of her mind rather than the size of her breasts, and so on and on and on, the author has every right to be snarky from time to time.


I think, and correct me if am wrong, you abandoned the book far too soon after dubbing it misandrist (ha! this derivative of "misandry" isn't even considered a word! "Misogyny" finds its roots in the 17th century, while "misandry" only came into existence in the 1940s) at times, but if every woman abandoned everything that was misogynistic, she would be left with nothing but a white room and perhaps a few pillows and a box of raisins.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

In Defense of Miley

I've sort of kept my mouth shut about all of the Miley Cyrus hubbub that was sparked by her VMA performance in August for fear of being misinformed. But much time has elapsed since then, and the media--and subsequently the public--will not let up on their relentlessly condescending and degrading barrage of insults towards Miley. 

Miley Cyrus represents the dilemma of the woman in today's society quite succinctly. You can either fit in, do what the majority tells you is "acceptable," never deviating from the beaten trail, and be called boring or be criticized for being just another girl. Or, you can do what you want to do, ignore the oppressive delineations of social acceptability, and de-objectify your body through a reverse-psychological tactic of commodification (example: Miley demystifies the eternally used and abused female form by treating it as no big deal, because it isn't. A nipple is just as much a part of the body as a nose or a finger), and be called a slut, skank, whore, tease, the list goes on and on. Essentially, you're not taken seriously if you take yourself seriously. The rest of the world takes you seriously ONLY if you take THEIR standards seriously. Herein lies the as-yet indomitable dichotomy between satisfying oneself and satisfying others. 

Let's start by breaking down the uncensored version of Robin Thicke's--that hypocritical and disgusting bastard--music video for his infamous song "Blurred Lines," which talks about lines which are definitely not blurred and are in fact quite clear. The video consists of three women wearing high heels and underwear, breasts bared, dancing around two fully-clothed men. I recommend taking a moment to watch the video right now. 

Once you've done that (or not, your choice--even a few seconds will sum up the ensuing four minutes), keep scrolling. I took some screenshots while watching the video that exemplify the nauseatingly pro-rape message.

He's holding her down, she's naked, he's clothed...Does he really want his name hash-tagged over that image?

Someone has low self-esteem...

That's a mini STOP sign. See that word, right there? STOP.

If we can all stop retching and look at the Jezebel article that juxtaposes Thicke's lyrics with rapist's comments to their victims, I think we can conclude that "Blurred Lines" is one of the most offensive songs in mainstream media in at least the last decade, if not the history of forever (disclaimer: I have no data to back that up).

But here's the real catch: the song that Miley sang and danced to that put her in the media spotlight and heralded her advent into the spot of the "token punk slut" or something ridiculous like that was--you guessed it--"BLURRED LINES" BY ROBIN THICKE. Did Thicke get any shit for it? Absolutely not. He was grinding on her just as much as she was grinding on him. That's it, the golden example of female oppression. Congratulations, world. You have succeeded in perpetuating one of the most pervasive evils of modern culture.

Earlier this month, Barbara Walters debuted her "10 Most Fascinating People of 2013" list, and Miley was on the list. Walters' interview with Miley showed just how demonized she has become. Miley said that she wore a Marc Jacobs dress to an event recently and was called boring because she wouldn't get naked, yet when she bares her body in a bra and underwear, she's labeled a naughty slut.

A few days ago Miley posted a short preview on her Instagram of a new music video that's debuting on December 26th for her song "Adore You." In the clip, Miley is wearing a bra and underwear and is touching herself. So of course, the media pounced on her, calling her "provocative" and "racy," and patronizing her for showing "self-admiration." In this case, self-admiration is just a fancy word for masturbation, which according to The World is a deadly sin for females but is perfectly acceptable for males, the same way male nudity is deified and female nudity is completely taboo. Prime example: Dylan Sprouse posted Instagram photos of him straight-up grabbing his penis and it got little press; there have been no parodies made, no global uprising of anti-Dylan backlash, NOTHING. He can put up a few Tweets and a blog post on Tumblr and have it all blow over, being forgiven by his faithful fans within moments. But Miley performs a deeply personal and heartfelt song while sitting naked on a wrecking ball (neither her breasts nor her crotch were actually displayed but rather tactfully covered by her arms or legs depending on the shot and camera angle), and she gets months, maybe even years worth of shit for it. No amount of apologies or Tweets or anything will make anyone think differently about her.

There's also the issue that when a woman chooses to portray herself as a sexual being the way Miley does, it's sinful and tasteless, but when a model in a bra and underwear is placed on a billboard in Times Square with the words "Victoria's Secret" smacked on next to her, it's called an advertisement and is a lucrative business. No one thinks twice about how overtly sexual the Victoria's Secret models are. And even if it is their choice to be modeling the undergarments, they are not doing it for themselves; they are doing it for a broad audience. When sex is handed to us, relinquished to us, surrendered to us, we take it wholeheartedly. But when sex is shown to us and we can't have it, we shame it into a state of scandal.

The truth of the matter is, Miley Cyrus grew up in the spotlight. If you're a teenager right now, think about how difficult it is to simply exist. And then think about doing that with the entire world watching. And if you're an adult, all you have to do is think the same way, only retrospectively. People go through phases, they undergo transformations, they reinvent themselves from the inside out--IT IS NOT A SIN, IT IS NOT MISGUIDED, IT IS NOT A SIGN OF BEING "TROUBLED" OR "NEEDING HELP." It is a natural process that each and every freaking one of us either has gone through or will go through, and to completely dehumanize Miley in this way is further testament to our world's (but especially this country's) insensitivity and outright aversion to noncomformity, healthy sexuality, and, to put it bluntly, females.

Have anything to say? Post it in the comments!!

Oh Yeah

PS I'm blonde


Ch-ch-changes

Perhaps you saw this coming. Perhaps you didn't.

As you very well know, I have been quite absent for this blog for quite some time. Part of the time I was in the midst of a major crisis, the other part of the time I was in the midst of switching schools, but now I have no excuse. I've been at my new school for almost two months and I feel at home there; now I am on winter vacation, and I haven't got many obligations. So why wouldn't I blog? I've neglected this site for long enough.

I've been reading this book about the riot grrrl revolution and while on the subway yesterday I was grabbed by this overwhelming feeling of urgency that I must act and act NOW. Not exclusively about feminism and not necessarily through punk rock music, but about EVERYTHING through EVERY MEDIUM. Since the riot grrrls hit their peak in the '90s, they didn't have the Internet at their disposal; to get their ideas out, they made zines. For a while on the train I thought, "I know what I must do. I must make zines. So many zines." But before long I realized that I don't really have the means for that, and printing all that paper isn't very environmentally economical. Then it dawned on me. I already have an established blog that I've been writing for almost three years--that's my vehicle. That's it!

As my mind, in turn, snapped into vicious shards and rebuilt itself, I have come to appreciate and consider a whole new world of ideas and possibilities. When I was at the hospital and only had jeans, pajama pants, and some t-shirts, my main priority was not fashion. I threw on what would make me the least uncomfortable and usually wore the same thing several times. Now that I am interning at a yoga studio, I have to wear clothing that is comfortable and movable, and often that boils down to the same five essentials (conclusion: I only wear flowy pants. I'm not even kidding). But this shift is not really about circumstantial changes; it's about the internal changes that have taken place within me. I still appreciate clothing and its beauty and its expressive qualities, but I despise the consumeristic and materialistic connotations of fashion itself. They simply do not align with my personal values any longer. So I stopped blogging for a while, because I had nothing to say.

But I do--I have SO MUCH to say, and plenty of ears cocked to listen. (That's you guys!) It's just that the things I have to say aren't really about clothing and trends and blah blah blah. They're about a world's worth of issues, global dilemmas, local frustrations, and everything in between. For so long I was afraid to be completely honest on this site despite the fact that I was willing to pour my guts out on, say, Hypocrite Reader. But that's all going to change. I write this blog so from now on you're going to hear my voice, not the one that I've artificially tailored to this site.

I'm on a huge mission, and I really need all the help I can get. I can't quite pinpoint what exactly my mission is without telling you that it's to change the world, because I have a feeling that might be an unhealthy ambition. But hey, a girl can dwell in possibility, can't she?

I don't know what the new incarnation of You're A Tulle is going to be, but I know that I'm going to publish what's on my mind and what I think is important. Essays, interviews, poetry, songs, videos, art--and who knows what else.

Thank you all so much for sticking by this site and not unfollowing me in this odd transitional interim--really, I mean it, thank you a bajillion and six times.

Murry Christmas Eve Day (YES THAT IS A THING)!!! Go watch some nice movies and eat some yummy snacks and please everyone be happy and fuzzy!!!

P.S. Check out the sick new banner I spent ALL NIGHT LAST NIGHT photoshopping.

Monday, December 16, 2013

An Open Letter to the New York City Department of Education

[I originally wrote this for Hypocrite Reader.]

To the New York City Department of Education:

Once upon a time there was a young girl, quiet but thoughtful, unconfident but hardworking, studious but idealistic. She was apparently very bright and showed lots of promise, but she had a tendency to be stifling perfectionistic. She had to be the best at everything. If she didn’t win the first time, she always won in the end. By the end of middle school, she had done it: she had been class president for three years, the lead in the musical, and the indomitable pi recitation champion. She had been granted a full scholarship to a private high school and accepted at one of the nation’s top art schools for both visual arts and vocals. She didn’t know it yet, but she was quite unhappy. So when she entered high school at the aforementioned art school, she figured it best to operate as she always had. She took honors classes and was on the accelerated math track and joined the photography club and showed her work in the semi-annual art show. She had straight A’s and lots of friends and a thriving fashion blog. But summer came, that window of twinkling humid daytime joy and simmering dewy nighttime bliss, and a sadness befell her. She had reached a checkpoint in her as yet short life.It began to dawn on her that looking around at everyone else made her want to cry because it made her realize that everything inside herself was a product of something that had been given to her. None of it belonged to her, and all of it was false. She could do things extremely well, because she regarded everything as a skill. Everyone had always told her that if you try hard enough you can do anything, so she lived by the idiomatic expression “practice makes perfect.” She wanted to be perfect. She wanted everyone to love her. But the reality was that she had only a few semi-superficial friends and did not know how to interact with others meaningfully. She hadn’t really given anyone a reason to love her because she did not know who this “she” was. She knew nothing about this girl. The past fifteen years had been spent accomplishing tasks, but if every piece of paper documenting her supposed success were to be incinerated, she would be a nameless insubstantial nothing. So she spoke to no one that summer unless she had to. She deleted her Facebook account and refused to wear makeup and stopped shaving her legs. She wanted to change, and seeing as she was so good at everything she did, she thought she had succeeded in changing. She wanted to face the coming school year with a fresh mind, a fresh start. But freshness soon spoils, and she was no exception. She was no different from how she was before; the only disparity between the two time frames was that now she was aware that everything was an overwhelming, wave-like, all-encompassing lie. She became sour and deflated and rotten. She sat at the back of the vegetable drawer, rotting away. No time for friends or exercise or sleep; she had AP World History homework to do, and that trigonometry test to prepare for, and that essay to write in French, and that chapter in Dickens to read. She had never failed at schoolwork; it was her constant. It was a given that she would excel academically. But you can stick an x next to a constant and it becomes a variable, a function of the unknown. Some days she would not go to certain classes and stayed in the bathroom, waiting. Other days she left early because she could not stand being there one more minute. One time she lost control sobbing during art class, choking on her own long-stewing stagnating anxiety, and did not stop for thirty minutes. There was no rest for the weary, as they say.

The sultry summer came once again, the light at the end of the tunnel. She thought she would be fine. Everything will be okay!, they told her. The next school year loomed before her, stretching and shrinking with each uncertain inhalation and exhalation. One moment she could tackle it, all was fine, the next it consumed and crushed her like a wave, all was not fine. They forced her to go back, so she went. This time, she knew she was unhappy. She had no constants, only variables. All her graphs were asymptotes, so close to zero, and yet so far. She began to destroy herself from the outside in. She rallied her finest soldiers and they laid siege to her body and her mind. She lifted a final finger to the telephone and called for help, seeing that her army had turned against her. They laid her in a bed in blue paper scrubs with fluorescent lights and constant bustle and beeping. Then they put her in a stretcher and took her to the countryside where she slept next to a stranger and got the drawstrings taken out of her pants and could only call her mother at noon and nine. She cried a lot, and so did everyone else around her. But she made progress. They eventually took her home and she went back and forth on the subway everyday so she could talk to the doctors. She eventually graduated from her treatment and was forced to return to school, despite her whimpering pleas. It took seventy-two hours before they finally believed her. They now understood that when you drop someone into a pool of acid she will fight and cry and claw her way out because the acid is toxic, not her. A week passed, and she placed herself in a new, different school, one that was right for her. She was rinsed clean, the burn marks beginning to fade. She could fathom happiness again. But now people question her. They cast aspersions on her judgement. Why don’t you want to take all those AP tests? You have the time to study now that you’re at your new school. Shouldn’t you start preparing for the SAT? You should at least take a practice one this weekend. They had warned her about peer pressure, about how all her friends would force her to smoke weed and get drunk and drive under the influence and jump off bridges. They told her this was the biggest threat high school posed. They never warned her that her parents and siblings and teachers would look at her as though her feet were on backward as soon as she began to clap out the uneven and hesitant rhythm of her inner drum. But she has learned not to blame herself. Now she blames you, Department of Education.

Yes, she blames you. Your heart is made of money and your brain is a mismatched circuit board of lies. Your money and your lies are in turn force fed into our mouths through the public school system. It is within your institutions that we are taught how to distinguish between intelligence and stupidity, success and failure, worth and worthlessness. Tell me. Am I stupid? Am I unsuccessful? Am I worthless? You pause, you check your documents, you look back up at me, vocal chords frozen all the while, for you fear to tell me what you perceive to be the truth. You conjecture that perhaps I may be all of those things, because I left one of the most prestigious and renowned high schools in the city to attend an unknown alternative transfer school. You give my high school a “C” grade every year as our rating because our students don’t graduate fast enough for your liking. Gosh, we’re sorry that the majority of our student body is comprised of teens from marginalized groups and low-income families, or that they might have small children that they need to take care of, or jobs they need to work to stay off the streets, or perhaps that they don’t even have a home at all. But you don’t care. All you see is a spreadsheet packed with numbers and letters. You mark these struggling adolescents with a stamp of inadequacy. You tell them from day one that they are simply mediocre. Just meh. Passable. Nothing special. And then you turn around to people like me, from middle class families and sufficiently stable homes with lots of academic and moral support, and pat us on the head and give us gold stars because we’re able to do exactly what you tell us. The key difference is that our lives are generally more stable, and that’s a huge advantage. But as soon as someone like me starts to become destabilized, you begin to bruise me left and right with that big stamp of inadequacy. After a while that ink seeps underneath my skin and into my bloodstream until every time my heart beats all I hear in that rhythm is fail-ure. Fail-ure. Fail-ure. You have the power to determine these things because you label us with numbers and letters, and then we go home to our families and they reinforce the importance of these numbers and letters,but we don’t understand how everything that’s important in the world could be dependent on what we do in one building during one small segment of our lives. I am not poor, I have food, water, and shelter whenever I need it, I have the support and motivation to pursue an education, and all of these factors play an enormous role in my ability to succeed in school. But most people in this city are not like me, and you penalize them for the circumstances that they have no control over. There is a huge contradiction at play here. You cater to the people with lifestyles that, statistically respond positively to your system of evaluation, allowing people with privileges to continue getting these privileges, even if it means that they will go on to perpetuate the standards and conditions that threaten to tear this country and this world to pieces. Yet you shame and shun the people with lifestyles that, statistically, respond negatively to your system, forcing people without privileges to continually be deprived of opportunities, even though these people, who are victims of the evils of our societies and have the perspective to enact true change, will most likely be bludgeoned into performing menial jobs or pursue capitalistically-beneficial careers out of necessity.

Let’s talk about education. The purpose of education is to teach and to learn; to impart knowledge from one person to the next. It is about learning for the bettering of oneself and society and the world. But that’s not what you would have said, is it? I didn’t think so. Education, as you practice it, isthe perfect way to disguise mass inculcation, to reorganize people based on socioeconomic standing, to manufacture workers and business(wo)men and CEOs, and to perpetuate global injustice. What better target for all of these noble causes than the malleable wide-eyed youth? The best part is that all of this is compulsory. “Education” is strictly enforced by law, but also by society. If one has not been formally educated, or has not gone to the right school, or does not have the right job, they are rejected and pushed off into the corners to go get their food stamps and wonder where they went wrong.

Therein lies the core of your issues. Your intentions, to begin with, are all wrong. They are anachronistic, and sorely out of place. The natural progression of education should go as follows: learning, leading to improvement of self and world; personal and communal development promoting general Goodness and Truth-seeking; desiring to teach and enlighten the future generation(s). Instead, this is the path you have set up: education, leading to a stable job; focusing on self-sustainability and materialism; instilling the future generations with the ideas that egocentricity, adherence to conventions, and fleeting satisfaction lead to success and happiness. Life, DOE (may I call you Ed?), is not about money and possessions, it is not improved by selfishness, nor is there any evidence showing that your ideology has done our planet or society any honest good.

Secondly, the execution of your system is also outrageously unsound. Imagine this scenario. Half the police department is stalking the hallways, barking at you to go to the cafeteria when you’re merely doing some homework in front of your locker. You are being herded through the day by various shouts and bells and angry teachers. You are in constant fear of having done something wrong, whether or not it was to your knowledge that you had committed any crime, nor that it was even a crime at all. You have to go to five different offices to see five different disgruntled faculty members if you need or want to leave school early, all of whom will turn you away if you don’t have a hall pass. You know each morning when you wake up that the coming day will be just as exhausting, draining, and unfulfilling as the one prior and the one following. You have to navigate an incessant barrage of evaluations and judgements. You spend eight and a half hours in school, commuting for two hours round-trip, have at least three hours of homework to do once you get home on top of basic functions such as eating and bathing. Worst of all, you are expected to do everything, literally everything, seamlessly and without fault, because otherwise you will be penalized for your lack of perfection. Now tell me, Ed, does this sound like an environment and/or a lifestyle that fosters learning? I’d be hard pressed to find anyone that could give me an enthusiastic “yes.” I could much more quickly find you ten students that would do anything to escape from having to subject themselves to the daily horrors they must endure to get an official-looking document and four years’ worth of hormonal, angry memories.

The graduation rate dropped by 0.5% from 2012 to 2013. The Common Core Curriculum, your government-funded disguise for the devil’s work, was fully instated in the 2012-2013 school year. We all felt the blow, students and teachers alike. When His Highness the Chancellor found out that the statewide graduation rate went from 65.5% to 64.7%, he “welcomed the news, noting that the higher standards were a challenge for the city’s students and teachers. ‘We continue to raise the bar and our students continue to rise to the challenge,’ Walcott [the chancellor] said.” Is that what we’re doing? If by rising to the challenge you mean straining our necks until we break our backs, then I suppose you’re right. Mr. Walcott, not everyone can meet your byzantine expectations when they have their basic survival and dignity to maintain. The harder you make it to get a high school diploma, the more you segregate this city, and inevitably the global community. If people predisposed with the ability to graduate find it impossible to do so without sacrificing their well-being and sanity,—and most of the time they do it anyway because they have been taught that that’s the only option—then what does that say about the students that don’t have the ability to graduate in the first place? A chasm grows and swells, that’s what happens. Society begins to divide between those that are allowed acquire an education and those that are not. Public school may be free, but the educated world is a rich man’s world. 31% of children aged seventeen and younger in New York City live below the poverty line. This is the exact age group that comprises the high school student body, and a third of them are impoverished. A similar figure represents the percentage of students that drop out of high school. The facts are glaringly obvious, yet you continue to ignore them.

At the start of junior year, I was convinced that I couldn’t escape from the tyranny and bureaucracy. My only option was simple enough. All I could do was just not go to school. I would take four trains in the morning instead of one to delay my arrival time. The earlier I got to school, the more time I would have to spend there until the final bell rang. As long as I was outside of the building they couldn’t do anything to me. I got off the subway near the MoMA and, after a few minutes of silently hoping to gain early access inside, decided not to wait another two hours until the museum opened, so I went on my way. I meandered towards Central Park, slowing down with each step that brought me closer to my prison cell. I climbed up onto a grassy hill and sat on a rock in my red windbreaker that was much too warm for the hot morning sun. My mother texted me and asked me if I’d arrived at school yet; I was supposed to let her know when I got there. I responded with a simple “no” and received a phone call from her within a few minutes. I told her that I was sitting in Central Park during first period sobbing with my hood covering my eyes, and I asked her if that was normal. She told me that no it wasn’t. She asked me to please go to second period. I shook my head and kept crying, begging. Don’t make me go. Please don’t make me do it. Please, mommy, please. She implored me to go, I didn’t have to do anything, all I had to do was be physically present. I reluctantly agreed, but only because I knew she had a class to teach in four minutes and I didn’t want to keep her on the phone. I went to class. And four days later I laid in blue paper scrubs on a white bed in a bright hallway watching Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone on a portable DVD player to pass the time. I stayed there for an additional four days, waiting for a space to open up at a treatment facility upstate. The beginning of the school year is the busiest time for mental hospitals.

Do you see the awful cycle you have created? We don’t want to go to school in the first place because it is a hellacious experience and even impossible for some. We fail our classes or drop out. The next year you make it more difficult. Each year you make it worse. By what fantastic logic would that lead to higher attendance rates and exam grades?

I don’t know exactly how it happened, but the high school experience has become simultaneously stigmatized and deified as a rite of passage for all adolescents. Wemust have this experience, because in the Real World, money doesn’t grow on trees, and people are greedy and mean, so really, high school isn’t all that bad, just you wait until you have to work a nine-to-five. You are right in some ways, Ed. Yes, many people are greedy and mean and selfish. No, money does not grow on trees. But how does that justify anything? Where did these greedy, mean, selfish people learn that their actions are acceptable? Where did they hear that everyone else is out for their job, their spouse, their soul? Maybe it was when they were in high school? During the most formative years of their life? Hm.

Ah, but you think that I am still neglecting Reality, that omnipotent truth of yours. I will concede that you are, again, correct to an extent. It is a known fact that the economy and the workforce are brutal and ruthless and difficult to navigate. As the unemployment rate has doubled in the past five years, reaching almost 9% in New York City, the suicide rate has also jumped. Approximately 18 out of 100,000 middle-aged New Yorkers committed suicide in 2010, in comparison to around 14 per 100,000 at the turn of the century. These are the members of the current workforce, and they’re miserable. It’s all very tragic, and I don’t mean that lightly—it really is. You seem to know all the answers, Ed. So tell me why this is happening. The statistics show that more and more of the working people are committing suicide presumably because of the terrible turn for the worst that our world has taken. Yet let us pause. The economy is not an autonomous being, and the bank is not an invincible monster. These are human creations. We live in a human world, and our problems are human problems. It is now startlingly clear how powerful the effects are of living this way, of trapping ourselves in a bubble of self-inflicted struggle and passing it on to our youth.

Elizabeth Wurtzel brought this issue to the public eye when she published Prozac Nation in 1994. Her title hit the nail on the head. It’s what we are. Over 24 million prescriptions were filled for Prozac in 2010 in this country alone. It’s the third most prescribed antidepressant, a runner-up to Zoloft and Celexa. Argue all you want that we’re overmedicated, that we can’t just take what the doctors give us and not do our research. Do that and you’re evading the real matter in question. It’s not that we shouldn’t be taking these medications, it’s that we shouldn’t have to be taking them. We are taught—and eventually teach ourselves—of the unreal horrors of the “world,” the problems we have placed before ourselves and given the titles of ‘human nature’ and ‘evolution’ and ‘history’ and so on. We are given a bottomless handbook of rules that are unnatural and oppressive, and told to follow them or else. We are a Prozac Nation because of you. You are the starting point. It is with you that we learn how to socialize, how to think, how to grow, how to create, and how to be. But you are harmful and poisonous. In turn, you churn out harmed and poisoned victims, some of whom go on to become harmful and poisonous people, and they have children, and those creatures grow up in a cyclically harmful and harmed, poisoned and poisonous world.

Seeing as the Common Core website’s tagline is “consider the source,” I think it’s time you heard something besides the sound of your own dishonest voice. Perhaps you could listen to me, a casualty of your corruption.

Teach our children knowledge, not information. Encourage them to digest, not to consume. These terms are demarcated by thin lines easily lost by the impatient eye. Be patient.

Teach our children without bias when applicable, and make them aware of a bias when it is unavoidable. Unfounded prejudice and bigotry plague our country to an unacceptable degree.

Don’t kill our children’s curiosity. Humans are naturally inclined to question, observe, and absorb, but if they are not given enough time to develop and nurture their spirit of inquiry independently, the desire is devoured by times tables and restless naptimes. Allow them to teach themselves, learn from one another, and fulfill their inherent thirst for knowledge without stifling it through force. Teach our children what is important, relevant, interesting, and inspiring, not what is going to be on the test. The Test is a lie and should be abolished.

Stop evaluating and judging our children at every minor checkpoint. Constant assessment begun at an early age garners a deep-rooted fear of failure. Failure itself is a falsehood that is measured subjectively and enforced negatively, when it is simply a neutral personal analysis that has been attributed antipathetic connotations. Often these “failures” are determined by external forces such as a numerical bracket or the opinion of an individual. They are not treated as opportunities to learn, they are shamed into exile and stuffed into the dusty bottoms of backpacks.

Stop overburdening our children with busywork and assignments that reinforce unassimilable facts and notions. Humans, especially developing ones, need to rest and rejuvenate. Social exploration is an integral part of the human experience, and should not be discouraged or denied. Depriving growing beings of sleep is cruel. Unrealistic expectations in the form of copious amounts of homework to be done after a long, tiring day of school create an unhealthy relationship with work itself, as well as academia in general, leading young people to sometimes reject both and pursue more hedonistic activities as a counterbalance. Regular physical activity is imperative to one’s health and should be promoted in positive ways instead of pigeon-holed into a selection of unappealing activities such as jumping jacks and weightlifting.

Stop teaching our children that their success in high school is indicative of their success in life. The two are by no means synonymous; they are not even correlative. By state-regulated standards, I will be a failure in life because I chose to go to an alternative high school and probably will choose to not attend a top-tier selective college. In reality, I will have an amazing life because I live by my own standards and have passions and talents that are unable to be quelled by your bureaucratic puzzle-piece doctrines.
You teach us to seek information instead of knowledge, success instead of fulfillment, stability instead of happiness. Reevaluate your own life before you wake up tomorrow and ruin another child’s.

Learn how to teach.

Sincerely,
Odelia Kaly

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

The Beginnings

HELLO DEAR READERS.

Sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry for being such a terrible blogger for the past few weeks/months/etc. I've been going through a lot of changes lately that have taken a lot of adjusting. I transferred schools about a month ago so I've been settling into that, and with it the new lifestyle I am now leading. I know that sucks for you in terms of having no new reading material from this site, but WAIT. It does benefit you, because in all my free time I've been thinking a hell of a lot about EVERYTHING, and then in a little bit you're just going to be bombarded with crazy amounts of radical crazy awesomeness from my brain, spilling out onto my keyboard and then into your brain.

Most of that stuff is not ready for public consumption quite yet, but there is something you can help me with right this very moment. I'm conducting an anonymous (READ: ANONYMOUS) survey about body image and self perception in order to write a comprehensible and factually accurate essay on the subject. It only takes a minute or two to fill out, and none of the questions are required; just provide the information you're comfortable giving. It doesn't matter how old you are, what your sex is, your race, ethnicity, NONE OF IT PROHIBITS YOU FROM TAKING THIS SURVEY. How cool is that. Support your local social scientists!!

Here it is. All you've got to do is click some boxes/bubbles and type a few things and press submit, and you're done. No strings attached, no weird spam emails, literally NOTHING except for the wonderful feeling that you've helped improved society just a little bit.



Thank you thank you thank you!!
If you want to support me further, PLEASE do not hesitate to share this survey with people that you know. You can send them the link to this post or the URL to the survey itself.

All of you rock, you are teacups!!!